Similar advantage can be also achieved in poker. To the position advantage in poker we can refer the factors of your position with relation to your opponents, the option of varied membership and the number of opponents continuing the nex777 competition, your aggression, the size of opponents’ stacks and so on. From all of the martial arts styles of poker the most important is the creation and realization of position advantage. Here it is as important like for example chess.
In conclusion is an mental analytic effort occurs both in chess and in poker but they are not alike as the position advantage differs in quality.
The third type of an mental effort is in touch with the analysis of the part of a game situation which is not in touch with the game process itself. This type includes taking into account the psychological peculiarities of the duel.
Strictly speaking, this psychological element is not as trusted in chess, mainly because of the game information which is fully open to both opponents.
In poker the psychological element is extremely important indeed. It provides almost the half of success of the player. The restricted type of information in poker makes the players only deducing it and it can be done only by noticing your opponent. And here you meet a great an opportunity to misinform or use him or create the psychological pressure upon him, and etc. We can name at least three elements of a psychological element that are often employed by experienced players.
Firstly, it is watching for the “signs” of an opponent and the “sings” that you send him. Secondly, one uses the continuous assessment of the psychological state of opponent. Finally, it’s possible to cause the psychological pressure upon the opponent in order to impose one’s will on him.
To conclude the aforesaid we can say that both games are mental quarrels but their profiles differ. From the three part of an mental effort : logical, analytical and psychological, the most important ones in chess are the first two during poker the last two. But the analytical component characterizes in the games, which is quite understandable because these two games are mental.
And finally there is the last comparative declaration. In chess, the role played by mindsets, is less important than the role of reasoning and analytics. Chess in this sense appears as the game of spirit. Irrespective of the state of mind the ball player must and can find the way to success, with this way not depending on human feelings and emotions. Chess is the philosophy, the game of aristocrats of a soul.
In poker the role of mindsets is more important especially useful reasoning. The meaning state of the opponent, their feelings and emotions not only influence the length of game but change the way to success. In this sense poker is a game of plebeians, the battle of human article topics.
Both, philosophers and plebeians, we are all human. Moreover, in our life in turns we become these and those. The games are beautiful, both are worth your attention under condition that your mind needs a check in a fight with equal ones, in other words, under condition that you are a hero.
In america active poker is not more than 100 years. In this regard if we make analogy between chess and poker we need to compare modern poker with the 19th century chess. Those were difficult times for chess players. Outstanding chess talents, which have received the general recognition in our times, had to spend sometimes each of their energy to find proponents who would agree to pay for such expensive and not perspective event as the world chess match for the champion title! But the reality was sad, any finder for the title had a chance to call for the world champion after fulfillment of one obligatory condition: he previously to pay prize money by himself, losing the great part of it in case of an inability. If the pretender would loose such match, the low income was almost guaranteed for him. Many years had passed before chess became the ethical and respected thing and the sad fates of losers became history.